Marry sherry

decisive Response In Mary Sherrys show In Praise of the F news program she describes how she feels that students argon being cheated by schools, non learning material and being passed on. She c whollys the diplomas that any(prenominal) kids target meaningless and in any geek goes as far to say that these graduates be semiliterate. Sherrys root word to the problem as she sees it is to use flunking students as a general policy, or at least threatening to flunk them to trigger them.She feels that the students who make it to educational- counterbalance shops or adult-literacy programs atomic number 18 fortunate. It is here in these educational repair shops hat Sherry states these students discover that they harbour been cheated by the educational system. I do non think that Sherry is fair in make these parameters. She did non present enough express to me to get me to buy into her arguments. There are several concerns with this essay that make her views un satisfying. My kickoff problem with this Essay is that Sherry teaches an adult-literacy program.From that rack she does get down some firsthand agnizeledge round the population of people in involve of basic grammar and writing skills, unless it also makes her bias. She states that Tens of Thousands of eighteen-year-olds will graduate this year and be handed meaningless diplomas. This statement raises umpteen questions for me and Sherry was non effective in convincing me of her views expressed. I feel like this statement was made to make her point appear more rea male childable. I would like to know what percentage overall is that number.I do not feel like she took into consideration that some(prenominal) of these students whitethorn excite learning and or developmental disabilities. How many of these students needed plain help and the schools in their district lacked the resources to appropriately help them? Were these tens of thousands of students really cheated or did the instr uctors and schools do the best they could to teach these students with the resources they had. Teachers are already overworked and underpaid and now Sherry is basically saying they are cheats.If the students were cheated that is saying that the teachers are charmers. The definition of cheater is to defraud, swindle, deceive, influence by fraud, to elude and to denudate something expected. This to me is precise harsh and shines a drab light on teachers who dedicate their lives to teaching. I found that her one experience with her male child who was hreatened by a teacher to be flunked does not prove that flunking is a peremptory tool. Yes it worked for him, his mformer(a) was an English teacher. How many of the other tens of thousands that Sherry speaks of had this same advantage?I do agree with Sherrys viewpoint that teachers require to get students attention in order for them to concentrate. In that one circumstance, with her son, threatening to flunk him worked. In that cas e I see that her son was swindling himself, not the teacher or the educational system being the cheater. Sherry does maintain that this one example, her son, does not make the case. erstwhile again I am left-hand(a) feeling like there is not enough evidence presented to get me to put up on the bandwagon and agree that the teachers of these tens of thousands of students are cheats.Sherry goes on to speak about passing students who have not mastered work. Passing students who nave not mastered the work cheats them and the employers who expect graduates to have basic skills. We excuse this dishonest fashion by saying kids cant learn if they settle from terrible environments. So now from Sherrys viewpoint the overworked, underpaid teachers are not only cheating these students, they are cheating mployers that hire them. This is very unreasonable. Sherrys views might be more acceptable to me if she held the student more accountable.A great teacher should not be labeled a cheat bec ause they have limited resources or students with very low academic standards for themselves. Flunking as a regular policy may work in some cases but as a fix all for all students, I disagree. It worked in the case of her son and kudos to them. Many students dont have Published English teachers to help and fall out them. Not all students have contain of their parents and their opportunity to succeed or expose rests purely on their shoulders.